page 1 - Twiglet Transformation - RAILWAY STRATEGIES - September-October 2002
Twiglet transformation
There are branch lines and then there are twiglet lines like the short link from Stourbridge Junction to Stourbridge Town, says ANDREW GORDON, who believes that innovative rolling stock can assist twiglet line viability, particularly if regulations are revised.
Could the 'railcar' which recently entered experimental public service on the branch line between Stourbridge Junction and Town be a pioneer for a new class of rail travel? This is emphatically the view of John Parry, who has developed the vehicle with the backing of £1.5 million of shareholders' funds. Operating for the present on Sundays only, the vehicle could, if parties agree, provide a daily service on the branch line at less than half the cost of the present Class 153 service. At a later stage the line could be extended beyond the Town station through Stourbridge town centre and operated as a street- running tramway. For this purpose, the vehicle floor (and railway platforms) would be lowered to 350mm and propulsion would be switched from the present LPG to electricity supplied when the vehicle is at rest. This highly versatile rail transport has been developed by Parry People Movers Limited from a concept originated by design engineers JPM Parry & Associates, of Cradley Heath, West Midlands (John Parry is chairman of both companies). The distinctive feature of the Parry design is the incorporation of a ¾-ton flywheel into the vehicle's drive train. When the vehicle has to stop frequently, such as in urban tramway service, the flywheel is charged at passenger stops through a railside contact under the passenger-boarding platform. In longer-range operation as a railcar, power is provided by a two- litre LPG motor running at more or less constant revs: the motor is sufficient to maintain cruising speed, while surge power (eg for pulling away) is provided by the flywheel. The
result is a vehicle of high environmental quality and thermal efficiency,
making no emissions and requiring no overhead wires as a tram and making
minimal emissions as a railcar. In both versions, brake energy is retrieved
to the flywheel |
![]() Trials on the Severn Valley Railway preceded Stourbridge Town branch Operation. |
|
| through the hydrostatic transmission. And it is the highly flexible stowage arrangements allowed by hydrostatic transmission that permit the easy change of floor level when converting between railcar and tramcar operation. Vehicles of the Stourbridge class will have about 22 seats and a maximum passenger capacity of 50 (the model will be known as the PPM 50). A 100- passenger 'twin' version (the 'PPM 100') is at the design stage. |
The vehicles are thus comparable with buses in scale and capacity and distinctly smaller and lighter than the smallest railway stock or the current generation of tramcars. They are intended to offer appropriate capacity on the many routes now considered marginal or sub-economic for conventional rail or trams."All too often", John Parry says, "rail vehicles are simply too large for the traffic, with the result that frequency is reduced and even more customers turn to the roads. A smaller, affordable vehicle offering a more frequent service - especially a turn- up-and-go service - will bring back traffic not only for the branch but for the main line it feeds." This may look like a niche market but John Parry sees it in the context of a potential wider renaissance of rail travel off the mainline network. There are many feeder lines, or lines which should be considered as feeders, where traffic could be revived with more frequent services or services at least matching the frequency on the mainline. Then there are what he calls the 'sleeping beauties': underused lines, often on preserved railways, which could have a more important role if properly employed and marketed. One such sleeping beauty is the Bewdley to Kidderminster section of the Severn Valley Railway, where the PPM 50 was first tested. This could provide a commuter and shopping service to central Kidderminster. Travellers from the Bewdley area to Birmingham could park at Bewdley and be carried swiftly to Kidderminster station, avoiding the uncertainties of both congestion in the town and parking at the mainline station.
|
|
| A
750-kilogram flywheel provides surge power and braking effort. ![]() |
||
page 2 - Twiglet Transformation - RAILWAY STRATEGIES - September-October 2002
After the sleeping beauties, which would be relatively easy to awaken, there are the 'visitor honey-pots': attractions, such as Stonehenge or the Eden Project, where there is a risk of the influx of visitors' cars seriously detracting from the visit experience. Access by light rail from suitably distant car parks or from a mainline station (or both) can preserve the site and the visitor's enjoyment of it. These services will normally require new track, but this will be light in weight and justified by the limited land take and high environmental quality of the transport provided. The provision of appropriate rolling stock is one catalyst for the renaissance of off-mainline rail travel. Another, says John Parry, would be a simple change in regulatory regime. If non-mainline services and track were released from the exigencies of railway 'Group Standards' and made subject to their own set of appropriate conditions, which would be more like tramway conditions, economics would be much improved and the introduction of new services greatly facilitated. A 'Secondary Railways' regime, as it might be called, would take account of lower speeds and tolerate more pedestrian crossing of the track, for example. The new regime could also encourage a high degree of local ownership and development of a regional character for each service. |
Improved economics and ridership off the mainline would have far-reaching effects. It is the branches and twiglets of the rail system that now receive the bulk of public subsidy: higher utilisation would allow the subsidy either to shrink or to serve many more people. It would make sense to bring old alignments back into use, many of which penetrate the heart of expanding and congested towns. And the mainline system, free of the burden of its twiglets, would look a whole lot more efficient, perhaps raising track utilisation to the levels of continental Europe. Twiglet
lines could benefit from a 'Secondary Railways' regime.
![]()
|